Can an insurer use the breed of a dog in underwriting and rating decisions if used in conjunction with other factors unrelated to the dog?

Only if the dog breed is not the sole factor determining a rating or underwriting decision, and as long as the elimination of the non-related factors does not result in the dog breed being the sole remaining underwriting factor.

Can an insurer use the breed of a dog in underwriting and rating decisions if used in conjunction with other factors unrelated to the dog?